From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rmallon@gmail.com (Ryan Mallon) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:01:52 +1000 Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] ep93xx: Add IDE support to edb93xx boards In-Reply-To: <4F86C753.3020200@metasoft.pl> References: <4F86C63C.6030908@metasoft.pl> <4F86C753.3020200@metasoft.pl> Message-ID: <4FCC4140.6000500@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/04/12 22:15, Rafal Prylowski wrote: > > Add IDE support to edb93xx boards. > > Signed-off-by: Rafal Prylowski > Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten > Cc: H Hartley Sweeten > Cc: Ryan Mallon Applied to ep93xx-devel. Sorry for the delay. Note, I fixed a minor build error, see below. ~Ryan > --- > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c > @@ -233,6 +233,29 @@ static void __init edb93xx_register_fb(v > } > > > +/************************************************************************* > + * EDB93xx IDE > + *************************************************************************/ > +static int __init edb93xx_has_ide(void) > +{ > + /* > + * Although EDB9312 and EDB9315 do have IDE capability, they have > + * INTRQ line wired as pull-up, which makes using IDE interface > + * problematic. > + */ > + return machine_is_edb9312() || machine_is_edb9315 || machine_is_edb9315() > + machine_is_edb9315a(); > +} > + > +static void __init edb93xx_register_ide(void) > +{ > + if (!edb93xx_has_ide()) > + return; > + > + ep93xx_register_ide(); > +} > + > + > static void __init edb93xx_init_machine(void) > { > ep93xx_init_devices(); > @@ -243,6 +266,7 @@ static void __init edb93xx_init_machine( > edb93xx_register_i2s(); > edb93xx_register_pwm(); > edb93xx_register_fb(); > + edb93xx_register_ide(); > } > > >