From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:31:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect Device Tree In-Reply-To: <20120601084850.GJ24139@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1338353260-10097-9-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120530100302.GD9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120530121547.GJ9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FC63632.4030504@linaro.org> <20120530151119.GN9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FC63B39.6040905@linaro.org> <20120530164152.GP9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FC846CC.20801@linaro.org> <20120601084850.GJ24139@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <4FCDDFFC.3000902@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/06/12 09:48, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:36:28PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote: > >> This: > >>> sdi at 80126000 { >>> vmmc-supply =<&ab8500_ldo_aux3_reg>; >>> }; > >> Is the same as, and will cause no more issues than: > >>> static struct regulator_consumer_supply ab8500_vaux3_consumers[] = { >>> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vmmc", "sdi0"), >>> }; > >> ... because only nodes which we care about (dictated by compatible >> declaration protections) will be parsed. So different platforms will >> not affect each other. > > What makes you say the two are equivalent? The former is a reference > from a consumer device to a named regulator while the latter is a > reference from a regulator to a named consumer. I mean they both link regulator<->consumer and apply the name "vmmc" to the supply, or am I missing something / getting confused? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog