From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect Device Tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:27:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD5C829.2090408@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120605103846.GQ23408@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 05/06/12 11:38, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:31:24AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 01/06/12 09:48, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> What makes you say the two are equivalent? The former is a reference
>> >from a consumer device to a named regulator while the latter is a
>>> reference from a regulator to a named consumer.
>
>> I mean they both link regulator<->consumer and apply the name "vmmc"
>> to the supply, or am I missing something / getting confused?
>
> You're missing something - note what I say above about the direction the
> mapping is done in, and consider what happens if we've got two of the
> same PMIC down in a system.
I'm still not seeing how this would cause an issue. The only Device Tree
nodes which will be parsed are the ones which are specified by a
particular driver's compatible string, meaning that any other nodes
referencing similar regulator/supply names would be ignored. In case I
am still missing a critical point here, would you be kind enough to
provide an example that we can work though together?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-11 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 4:47 [PATCH 01/22] Fixes and clean-ups for Device Tree on Snowball Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 01/22] ARM: ux500: New DT:ed snowball_platform_devs for one-by-one device enablement Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 02/22] ARM: ux500: New DT:ed u8500_init_devices " Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 03/22] ARM: ux500: Disable SMSC911x platform code registration when DT is enabled Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 04/22] ARM: ux500: Remove DB8500 PRCMU platform " Lee Jones
2012-05-30 6:48 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 05/22] ARM: ux500: PRCMU related configuration and layout corrections for Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 06/22] ARM: ux500: Re-enable SMSC911x platform code registration during non-DT boots Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 07/22] ARM: ux500: Use correct format for dynamic IRQ assignment Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-05-30 6:58 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 10:03 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-30 11:40 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-30 12:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-30 15:01 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-30 15:11 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-30 15:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-30 16:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-31 0:42 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-01 4:36 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-01 8:48 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 10:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-05 10:38 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-11 10:27 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-06-11 10:36 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-11 11:28 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 11:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-31 1:40 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-01 14:32 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 09/22] regulator: Change db8500-prcmu " Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:00 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-05 10:24 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-05 10:29 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 10:34 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-05 10:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-06 8:17 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 11:21 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 12:08 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-11 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 14:07 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 14:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-11 14:50 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-11 15:18 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:39 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-11 15:59 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 16:09 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 10/22] ARM: ux500: Disable platform setup of the ab8500 when DT is enabled Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 11/22] ARM: ux500: Only initialise STE's UIBs on boards which support them Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 12/22] ARM: ux500: Apply db8500-prcmu regulator information to db8500 Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 13/22] ARM: ux500: Allow PRCMU regulator to be probed during a DT enabled boot Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 14/22] ARM: ux500: Provide regulator support for SMSC911x via Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:05 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 15/22] ARM: ux500: Add support for ab8500 regulators into the " Lee Jones
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 16/22] mfd: ab8500-gpadc: Enable IRQF_ONESHOT when requesting a threaded IRQ Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:10 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-29 13:21 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 17/22] rtc: ab8500-rtc: " Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:11 ` [rtc-linux] " Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 18/22] mfd: Remove redundant Kconfig entry Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:15 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 7:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-29 13:24 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 19/22] net/smsc911x: Repair broken failure paths Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:16 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 21:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 20/22] pinctrl-nomadik: Allow Device Tree driver probing Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:18 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 21/22] ARM: ux500: Enable probing of pinctrl through Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:18 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-30 4:47 ` [PATCH 22/22] mfd: Enable DT probing of the DB8500 PRCMU Lee Jones
2012-05-30 7:19 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD5C829.2090408@linaro.org \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).