From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shubhrajyoti@ti.com (Shubhrajyoti)
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:09:34 +0530
Subject: [PATCHv10 00/11] I2C fixes
In-Reply-To: <20120611160034.GA3887@pengutronix.de>
References: <1338288983-15026-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
 <87obp4x8gs.fsf@ti.com>
 <CAM=Q2ctZmOFdroUw5qywwGU_4ResB9RKqag4-+qh3nHeKHWzKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120611160034.GA3887@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <4FD62D56.2020500@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Monday 11 June 2012 09:30 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Agree,
>> > These are only fixes can it be considered for rc3?
> "Baking in linux-next" and "considering rc3" don't match; baking needs
> time, rc3 is soon. I've put the patches now into my -next branch for
> more exposure.
Thanks.
>  I am still uncertain if they should be in 3.5 already;
> there seem to be worhty fixes in there, but they do depend on stuff
> which don't really qualify as bugfixes...