From: josh.wu@atmel.com (Josh Wu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] MTD: nand: add return value for write_page() function in structure of nand_ecc_ctrl.
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:06:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD722B2.3080407@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339498176.2401.27.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Hi, Artem
Thanks for the review.
On 6/12/2012 6:49 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 19:10 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> /**
>> + * nand_write_page_none - [INTERN] raw page writen function with return value
>> + * @mtd: mtd info structure
>> + * @chip: nand chip info structure
>> + * @buf: data buffer
>> + * @oob_required: must write chip->oob_poi to OOB
>> + */
>> +static inline int nand_write_page_none(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> + struct nand_chip *chip,
>> + const uint8_t *buf, int oob_required)
>> +{
>> + nand_write_page_raw(mtd, chip, buf, oob_required);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
> Thanks!
>
> Would you please also make the wrtite_page_raw call-back return an error
> code - it is just strange to change '->write_page' and avoid changing
> '->write_page_raw'...
Ok. I'll do a version 2 patch that makes write_page_raw return an error
code too.
>
> P.S. Not sure we still want these baroque header comments, but this is
> just a side note and separate issue.
>
If change the write_page_raw call back with return value. then I will
remove all the function and comments.
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-12 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-08 11:10 [RFC PATCH] MTD: nand: add return value for write_page() function in structure of nand_ecc_ctrl Josh Wu
2012-06-12 10:49 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-12 11:06 ` Josh Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD722B2.3080407@atmel.com \
--to=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).