From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] i2c: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:01:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD83AAD.2010701@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYxiT-0x4aetMxB2x8SkB+Mmy8rk8uSzgU_anemSayhMw@mail.gmail.com>
On 13/06/12 06:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Lee Jones<lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 11/06/12 21:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>
>>> So why don't we create proper device tree bindings for the above platform
>>> data?
>>> (...)
>>> This looks to me like a way to push the burden of doing the real
>>> device tree binding for the above to the next user.
>>> (Which will likely be me, so therefore I care a bit ...)
>>
>>
>> On the contrary. This will avoid any added Device Tree complexity and ensure
>> that no extra vendor specific bindings are required. When a new user wishes
>> to use the driver, all they (you) have to do is create a new struct with the
>> platform specific information and add the entry to nmk_gpio_match[],
>> simples.
>>
>> I've even added the logic to extract any information you provide via
>> nmk_gpio_match[] for use as platform data. This keeps it both out of
>> platform code and the Device Tree binary. Everyone's a winner. :)
>
> No. You assume that the platform data is a chip-specific property,
> and that it will be the same for all busses on the chip. But it
> isn't.
>
> The above platform data is *board specific*, it depends on
> what devices have been connected to each bus.
>
> For example the max frequency: this depends on the maximum
> frequency any of the devices connected to one very bus
> can support.
>
> The other platforms have put this frequency into their device
> trees for a reason, and this is it.
>
> So for the four different i2c busses there may need to be
> four different platform data sets. How are you going to
> distinguish between the four buses?
>
> This is thus broken and needs to have proper bindings.
Board specific is fine, as the data is protected by a board specific
property. Do you mean that the properties are *bus specific*? In which
case I see your point and will apply the correct bindings.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 15:24 [PATCH 00/14] Final (large) batch of Snowball Device Tree Enablement Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 01/14] rtc: ab8500-rtc: IRQF_ONESHOT when requesting a threaded IRQ Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-11 15:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-11 16:01 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 20:54 ` [rtc-linux] " Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 8:57 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-13 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-14 7:14 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-14 7:30 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-14 8:02 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 02/14] rtc: Ensure correct probing of the AB8500 RTC when Device Tree is enabled Lee Jones
2012-06-11 20:56 ` [rtc-linux] " Linus Walleij
2012-07-02 15:23 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 03/14] mfd: ab8500-gpadc: Enable IRQF_ONESHOT when requesting a threaded IRQ Lee Jones
2012-06-11 20:54 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 8:58 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 04/14] mfd: Remove redundant Kconfig entry Lee Jones
2012-06-11 20:57 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 05/14] mfd: Enable DT probing of the DB8500 PRCMU Lee Jones
2012-06-11 20:58 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-29 14:47 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-06-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 06/14] mfd: Initialise the DB8500 PRCMU driver at core_initcall time Lee Jones
2012-06-11 21:01 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 8:11 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-12 8:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-12 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-12 13:23 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-12 14:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-12 15:39 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-18 8:32 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-29 14:48 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 07/14] mfd: Initialise the AB8500 " Lee Jones
2012-06-11 21:03 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 8:13 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-12 8:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-29 14:51 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 08/14] mfd: Add IRQ domain support for the AB8500 Lee Jones
2012-06-11 21:33 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 8:01 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-14 18:32 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-15 12:49 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-18 9:02 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-18 9:32 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-18 10:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-18 18:56 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 13:00 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-21 7:37 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-26 9:04 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-20 9:12 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 09/14] i2c: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver Lee Jones
2012-06-11 19:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-06-12 7:23 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-12 8:52 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-12 8:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-06-11 20:37 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 7:34 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-13 5:40 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-13 7:01 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-06-13 8:12 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-13 12:28 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-14 18:36 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-14 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-14 18:59 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-14 18:57 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-15 9:32 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-15 10:00 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-15 10:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-15 11:43 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-13 16:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Lee Jones
2012-06-14 17:12 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-15 9:02 ` Lee Jones
[not found] ` <CAE2-_9rRYxjU9QQgtBv9ReMY5x+oRiJG1cDQahYHanjDrwVUYA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-15 11:50 ` Fwd: " Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-06-15 12:45 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-15 13:05 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-06-15 13:18 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-15 13:37 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-06-15 13:58 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-17 17:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-18 7:18 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-18 7:58 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-06-18 8:41 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-13 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: ux500: Add i2c configurations to the Device Tree for DB8500 based devices Lee Jones
2012-06-14 17:13 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-18 11:29 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-18 11:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-13 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik driver Lee Jones
2012-06-14 17:13 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 10/14] Input: Add Device Tree support to the ab8500-ponkey driver Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 11/14] usb: otg: Enable probing of the ab8500 during a Device Tree boot Lee Jones
2012-06-11 21:39 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-02 15:24 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: ux500: Correctly reference IRQs supplied by the AB8500 from Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-06-11 21:41 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: ux500: Enable the AB8500 RTC for all DT:ed DB8500 based devices Lee Jones
2012-06-11 21:42 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-11 15:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: ux500: Move rtc-pl031 registration to Device Tree when enabled Lee Jones
2012-06-11 21:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 8:03 ` Lee Jones
2012-06-12 14:32 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-12 14:44 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD83AAD.2010701@linaro.org \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).