From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:14:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/14] rtc: ab8500-rtc: IRQF_ONESHOT when requesting a threaded IRQ In-Reply-To: <20120613152558.e6025b04.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1339428307-3850-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1339428307-3850-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <201206111531.20468.arnd@arndb.de> <4FD70481.6020207@linaro.org> <20120613152558.e6025b04.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: <4FD98F69.3010302@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 13/06/12 23:25, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:57:37 +0100 > Lee Jones wrote: > >> The kernel now forces IRQs to be ONESHOT if no IRQ handler is passed. > > What does this mean. The kernel crashes? The registration fails? A > warning is emitted? > > When fixing a bug, please fully describe the consequences of that bug. > >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org > > Especially when suggesting a -stable backport. No problem. I'll try to remember that for next time. I see that you've taken the patch into your tree however. So do you want me to update the commit log and resubmit, or are you going to 'let this one slide'? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog