From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (a0393909)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: remove runtime cpu_is checking
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:31:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD9B692.4080208@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204300835550.10308@utopia.booyaka.com>
Paul,
On 04/30/2012 08:11 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> This series attempts to remove all the runtime cpu_is* checking in
>> omap_hwmod.c in favor of using function pointers initialized at init
>> time.
>>
>> This series was motivated by the addition of support for the AM335x
>> series which was done by adding several more cpu_is* checks, and
>> provided the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.
>>
>> In addition to the cleanup, this provides a much cleaner way of adding
>> additional SoC support since it no longer requires adding additional
>> runtime cpu_is* checks.
>>
>> Boot tested on OMAP3530/Overo and OMAP4430/Panda.
>
> Thanks Kevin, this series should bridge the gap nicely between the current
> code, and the point in time that we're able to move these functions into
> PRM/CM device driver code. And allow us to avoid adding more cpu_is_*()
> when we merge Vaibhav's hwmod changes.
>
> As you've probably seen, the patches have been updated here. The function
> pointers have been made file-static rather than per-hwmod; this should
> conserve some memory and cache. Since they don't change on a per-hwmod
> basis, this should be safe. Also added quite a bit of kerneldoc --
> basically I have an internal rule here now to ensure this exists on all
> functions and structures that are added, so it would be great to have this
> on future code :-)
>
> The updated series is at git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 in
> the "hwmod_soc_conditional_cleanup_3.5" branch. Please let me know if
> you have any comments. It's only compile-tested here so far. I'll be
> rebasing my local copy of Vaibhav's series on it and will plan to send it
> upstream for 3.5.
>
I guess this series missed 3.5 merge window. I was re-basing the OMAP5
minimal support against the 3.5-rc2 and one of the dependency for that
series is $subject series.
Tony,
How do we get the dependent series merged early enough so that OMAP5
support can be merged in linux-omap master to avoid any late build
breaks.
Regards
santosh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-27 20:05 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: remove runtime cpu_is checking Kevin Hilman
2012-04-27 20:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod: rename _enable_module to _omap4_enable_module() Kevin Hilman
2012-04-29 10:11 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-04-30 14:22 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-30 17:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-27 20:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: use init-time function ptrs for enable/disable module Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 14:28 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-27 20:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod: drop extra cpu_is check from _wait_target_disable() Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 14:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-27 20:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: use init-time function pointer for wait_target_ready Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 14:33 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-27 20:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: use init-time function pointer for hardreset Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 14:34 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-27 20:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: use init-time function pointer for _init_clkdm Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 14:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-29 10:29 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: remove runtime cpu_is checking Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-04-30 12:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-30 16:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-30 14:41 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-06-14 10:01 ` a0393909 [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD9B692.4080208@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).