linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: protect the power domain state change by a mutex
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:47:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE1952D.1020102@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339685591-11177-2-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>

On Thursday 14 June 2012 08:23 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> omap_set_pwrdm_state is intented to be the only API for changing
> a power domain state.

Yes, but there are others which are used to _read_ the power domain
state. Shouldn't those be protected too?

> This patch protects the power domains settings and structs from
> concurrent accesses to the function by using a mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@ti.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c          |    8 ++++++--
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c |    1 +
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h |    3 ++-
>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index 9cb5ced..a05f00c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -100,15 +100,17 @@ int omap_set_pwrdm_state(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u32 pwrst)
>   	if (!pwrdm || IS_ERR(pwrdm))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>
> +	mutex_lock(&pwrdm->lock);
> +
>   	while (!(pwrdm->pwrsts&  (1<<  pwrst))) {
>   		if (pwrst == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> -			return ret;
> +			goto out;
>   		pwrst--;
>   	}
>
>   	next_pwrst = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(pwrdm);
>   	if (next_pwrst == pwrst)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto out;
>
>   	curr_pwrst = pwrdm_read_pwrst(pwrdm);
>   	if (curr_pwrst<  PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
> @@ -141,6 +143,8 @@ int omap_set_pwrdm_state(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u32 pwrst)
>   		break;
>   	}
>
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&pwrdm->lock);
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> index 9611490..1641e72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static int _pwrdm_register(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwrdm->voltdm_node);
>   	voltdm_add_pwrdm(voltdm, pwrdm);
>
> +	mutex_init(&pwrdm->lock);
>   	list_add(&pwrdm->node,&pwrdm_list);
>
>   	/* Initialize the powerdomain's state counter */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
> index 8f88d65..bab84fc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>
>   #include<linux/types.h>
>   #include<linux/list.h>
> -
> +#include<linux/mutex.h>
>   #include<linux/atomic.h>
>
>   #include<plat/cpu.h>
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct powerdomain {
>   	struct clockdomain *pwrdm_clkdms[PWRDM_MAX_CLKDMS];
>   	struct list_head node;
>   	struct list_head voltdm_node;
> +	struct mutex lock;
>   	int state;
>   	unsigned state_counter[PWRDM_MAX_PWRSTS];
>   	unsigned ret_logic_off_counter;

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-14 14:53 [PATCH v4 0/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce the power domains functional states Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: protect the power domain state change by a mutex Jean Pihet
2012-06-20  9:17   ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce power domains functional states Jean Pihet
2012-06-15 11:20   ` Jean Pihet
2012-07-13  3:01   ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-07-13  4:39     ` Nishanth Menon
2012-07-13  5:26     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-13  5:29       ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-07-13  7:18         ` Jean Pihet
2012-07-13  7:27           ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-07-13  7:07     ` Jean Pihet
2012-07-13  7:14       ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: use the functional power states API Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce power domains logic and memory functional states Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce power domains achievable " Jean Pihet
2012-06-15 11:28   ` Jean Pihet
2012-07-19  6:57     ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: use the functional power states API for logic and memory Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: use power domain functional state in stats counters Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 14:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM debug: trace the functional power domains states Jean Pihet
2012-07-13 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce the power domains functional states Jean Pihet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE1952D.1020102@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).