From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:32:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: formalize an IPI for CPU wake-ups In-Reply-To: <20120611192519.GF18267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120611155716.GA18267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120611165115.GB18267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4FD62DBB.8070407@codeaurora.org> <20120611192519.GF18267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4FE1FB15.3090305@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/11/12 12:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:41:15AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 06/11/12 10:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >>> It certainly works for all the targets I'm looking at right now. In >>> those cases the boot protocol couldn't care less about the IPI number as >>> the point is only to kick the target CPU out of WFI. >>> >>> And that message certainly has to go as it may be triggered multiple >>> times per second in some use cases here. >>> >>> >> Last time this came up I thought we covered most of the platforms? >> >> OMAP, Realview, Versatile Express, and MSM are covered by this thread >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-January/039275.html > Ok, in that case I've just committed three patches to make those platforms > use SGI0 instead of SGI1. Great. Kukjin Kim, can exynos use SGI0? It looks like exynos is the only one left to move to SGI0. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.