From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:06:06 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 04/29] ARM: omap: clk: use clk_prepare_enable and
 clk_disable_unprepare
In-Reply-To: <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com>
References: <1339678038-23082-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
 <1339678038-23082-5-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
 <20120614191147.GP19410@gmail.com> <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com>
 <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <4FE2B2C6.4010904@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wednesday 20 June 2012 05:11 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>  [120614 22:01]:
>> On Friday 15 June 2012 12:41 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> On 20120614-18:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>> As we move to Common clk framework use clk_prepare_enable()
>>>> instead of clk_enable() and similarly clk_disable_unprepare()
>>>> instead of clk_disable()
>>>>
>>>> Based on initial changes from Mike turquette.
>
> Sounds like these kind of patches should be a separate series
> to prepare for the common clk fwk conversion? It seems these
> could already get merged separately?

yes, I will post them out separately as a preparatory series for
CCF conversion.

I also have some to get rid of the omap_clk_get_by_name() usage and
direct dereferencing of 'struct clk'.

Paul, are you ok to look at them as preparatory patches for CCF
conversion too?

>
> Tony