From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mkl@pengutronix.de (Marc Kleine-Budde) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:29:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: flexcan: add transceiver switch gpios support In-Reply-To: <20120628112111.GC22990@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1340853701-4488-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1340853701-4488-3-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <4FEC329C.7070004@pengutronix.de> <20120628112111.GC22990@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <4FEC400F.8010506@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/28/2012 01:21 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> Hmm I'm wondering if transceiver or phy is the correct name here. In >> platform_data it's called transceiver_switch. > > The transceiver_switch in platform_data names a function, while we are > naming a couple gpios which happen to be access in that function. It > looks all correct to me. I mean which name is more precise, do these gpio enable/standy a "phy" or a "transceiver". For example: http://www.nxp.com/documents/application_note/AN00094.pdf, this document says: TJA1041/1041A high speed CAN transceiver. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: