From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mkl@pengutronix.de (Marc Kleine-Budde) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:10:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: flexcan: add transceiver switch gpios support In-Reply-To: <20120628120835.GA3402@vandijck-laurijssen.be> References: <1340853701-4488-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1340853701-4488-3-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <4FEC329C.7070004@pengutronix.de> <20120628112111.GC22990@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4FEC400F.8010506@pengutronix.de> <20120628114108.GD22990@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120628120835.GA3402@vandijck-laurijssen.be> Message-ID: <4FEC49AD.1000609@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/28/2012 02:08 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 07:41:10PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:29:19PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>> I mean which name is more precise, do these gpio enable/standy a "phy" >>> or a "transceiver". For example: >>> http://www.nxp.com/documents/application_note/AN00094.pdf, this document >>> says: TJA1041/1041A high speed CAN transceiver. >>> >> Isn't term "phy" (physical interface) generally meant to be the same >> thing as "transceiver"? I just happened to like the shorter one as >> what Hui did in his patch. > > 'trx' seemed the right abbreviation > http://www.acronymfinder.com/TRX.html > > thanks to Oliver, in his email on May 9th. I was about to propose CamelCase to keep the variable names shorter: bool transceiverStbyActiveLow; scnr, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: