From: shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com (Shinya Kuribayashi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: allow timer-based delay implementation to be selected
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 22:06:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF59145.2020009@renesas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340991231-17682-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
On 6/30/2012 2:33 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c
> index dbbeec4..675cee0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ static int arch_timer_ppi2;
>
> static struct clock_event_device __percpu **arch_timer_evt;
>
> +extern void init_current_timer_delay(unsigned long freq);
> +
This is needed for all users of the new timer-baed delay routine.
How about moving this extern declaration to more generic place, in
<asm/timex.h>?
> /*
> * Architected system timer support.
> */
> @@ -304,6 +306,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_register(void)
> if (err)
> goto out_free_irq;
>
> + init_current_timer_delay(arch_timer_rate);
> return 0;
>
> out_free_irq:
This is arch_timer-land change. I'd prefer to see general part changes
first, followed by arch_timer ones making use of them.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/delay.c b/arch/arm/lib/delay.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e1030e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/delay.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
[...]
> +void __init init_current_timer_delay(unsigned long freq)
> +{
> + pr_info("Switching to timer-based delay loop\n");
> + lpj_fine = freq / HZ;
I've been preparing for lpj_fine with rounding it up by HZ like this:
lpj_fine = (freq + (HZ/2)) / HZ;
It's not necessarily required, but just in case.
> + arm_delay_ops.delay = __timer_delay;
> + arm_delay_ops.const_udelay = __timer_const_udelay;
> + arm_delay_ops.udelay = __timer_udelay;
> +}
> +#endif
I modified pr_info() at the end of function to print (lpj=%lu),
+ pr_info("Switching to timer-based delay loop (lpj=%lu)\n", lpj_fine);
but turned out to be printed twice, no-so-great:
sched_clock: 32 bits at 13MHz, resolution 76ns, wraps every 330382ms
cmt: CMCLKE e6131000 mapped to e6131000
sh_cmt.11 at 0xe6130100 probed with CMCLKE
sh_cmt.12 at 0xe6130200 probed with CMCLKE
sh_cmt.11 used for periodic clock events
sh_cmt.11 used for clock events
Switching to timer-based delay loop (lpj=101562) <<<
Console: colour dummy device 80x30
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 26.04 BogoMIPS (lpj=101562) <<<
Anyway,
Tested-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com>
Thank for the work, hope this to be merged soon!
Shinya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-29 17:33 [PATCH v2 0/2] Use architected timers for delay loop Will Deacon
2012-06-29 17:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: arch timer: implement read_current_timer and get_cycles Will Deacon
2012-07-02 19:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-05 12:35 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-05 12:59 ` Will Deacon
2012-06-29 17:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: allow timer-based delay implementation to be selected Will Deacon
2012-07-02 19:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-02 21:53 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-03 12:09 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-04 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-05 12:12 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-05 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-05 16:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-05 13:06 ` Shinya Kuribayashi [this message]
2012-07-05 14:15 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-12 7:33 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-12 8:44 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-12 9:35 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-12 16:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-13 2:16 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-13 8:57 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-13 10:48 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-13 11:13 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-13 12:04 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-13 12:08 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-13 12:14 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-13 12:23 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-13 12:28 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-17 3:10 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-17 6:11 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-17 7:42 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-17 9:05 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-19 12:43 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-18 17:52 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-19 15:19 ` Jonathan Austin
2012-07-20 10:17 ` Will Deacon
2012-07-24 9:06 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2012-07-24 9:15 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF59145.2020009@renesas.com \
--to=shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).