linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:54:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF59C7C.5020406@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120705132021.GJ4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On 05/07/12 14:20, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:12:09PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 05/07/12 14:03, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>>>> Then were would you register it, if not here?
>
>>> Same place as for DT.
>
>> That is a possibility, but the idea is to reduce code in the
>> platform area, not add to it. We'd also need a completely separate
>
> But surely this would, if anything, remove code?  You already have the
> code to do the registration in the MFD so all you're going to be doing
> here is removing the code from

No, it will add platform code if we were to register the ab8500 from the 
platform area.

>> platform_data structure to the one we use for platform registration,
>> as much of it has now been moved into Device Tree. The regulators
>> are a good example of this, but there's also GPIO information which
>> is no longer relevant etc.
>
> Hrm, the usual pattern for this stuff is that the DT is parsed into
> platform data so the DT code is isolated to the parser.  It sounds like
> you've got a very different structure here?

Yes we do. Ref that commit ID I sent you you a few days ago:

5f3fc8adeec9bb12742fbfa777fa1947deda21a2

>> I do believe that registering the AB8500 from the DB8500 is
>> appropriate though, for the simple reason that the AB8500 is a
>> sub-device to the DB8500. I think this is the correct thing to do.
>> But anyway, as I said before, that ship has sailed. We _already_ do
>> this. All this patch does is prevent the AB8500 from being
>> registered twice when DT is not enabled.
>
> Well, it also introduces code into mainline which is likely to be used
> as a template by other people - I'd be especially worried about the next
> ST platform ending up repeating the same mistakes.

There are no mistakes. It would work for other platforms. :)

> If the code is so
> separate perhaps it's better to just remove the non-DT support?

That's the plan.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-05 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-03 11:59 [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration Lee Jones
2012-07-03 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:07   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 13:24     ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:48       ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 14:21         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05  7:36           ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05  9:45             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 11:46               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:06                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:15                   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:29                     ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:41                       ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:45                         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:55                           ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:03                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:12                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:20                                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:54                                   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-07-05 13:57                                     ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:06                                 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-05 13:57                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 14:04                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:06                             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 14:13                               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:35                                 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 15:41                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 15:51                                     ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 14:01       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 14:43         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05  7:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:08 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-07-05 13:13   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF59C7C.5020406@linaro.org \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).