From: zchen@windriver.com (zumeng.chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:03:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF5ACA9.3090903@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433EAF8359@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
On 2012?07?05? 21:05, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 21:24:01, Zumeng Chen wrote:
>> Does the following fix make sense?
>>
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS always return 0 even if the machine
>> comes from omap-wdt reboot. Because WKUP_MOD is not right
>> for OMAP3, so give the right addr 0xA00 of PRM_RSTST for
>> get_reset_sources, which inputs the signal from omap-wdt
>> reboot, and return 1 when coming from omap-wdt reboot for
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen<zumeng.chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c | 4 +++-
>> drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c | 3 +++
>> drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h | 3 +++
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> index 480f40a..43f3feb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ void __iomem *prcm_mpu_base;
>> u32 omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(void)
>> {
>> /* XXX This presumably needs modification for 34XX */
>> - if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> + if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>> return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)& 0x7f;
>> + if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> + return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(0xA00, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)& 0x7f;
>> if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
>> return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP4_RM_RSTST)& 0x7f;
> Instead of adding more cpu_is_* checks maybe you could switch to a
> function pointers based approach here?
I don't see any more checks VS before like ( cpu_is_omap24xx() ||
cpu_is_omap34xx())
Actually what we want is just to read a register with different offset
responding to the different SOC.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> index 8285d65..ea57078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> @@ -234,6 +234,9 @@ static long omap_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>> if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>> return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(),
>> (int __user *)arg);
>> + if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> + return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources()& 0x10>>
>> + OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT, (int __user *)arg);
>> return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg);
> Usage of PRCM bit masks in the driver looks wrong. Why not
Maybe the not proper definition causes "looks wrong".
It should be MPU_WD_RST_BIT, so you see, it is about
watchdog bit.
Anyway, I'll try to send V2 patch with Hubhrajyoti's and your
comments
Regards,
Zumeng
> introduce an API like omap_prcm_check_reset_reason() which
> returns true or false based on the reset reason being checked?
>
> In case of WDT, the driver can then pass the right flag to
> userspace.
>
> Regards,
> Vaibhav B.
>
>> case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(wdev->dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> index 09b774c..d8d5daa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
>> #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_WPS (0x34)
>> #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR (0x48)
>>
>> +/* PRM_RSTST MPU_WD_RST bit */
>> +#define OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT 4
>> +
>> /* Using the prescaler, the OMAP watchdog could go for many
>> * months before firing. These limits work without scaling,
>> * with the 60 second default assumed by most tools and docs.
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 15:54 [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot Zumeng Chen
2012-07-04 15:57 ` zumeng.chen
2012-07-05 5:39 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-05 6:00 ` Zumeng Chen
2012-07-05 13:05 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-07-05 15:03 ` zumeng.chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF5ACA9.3090903@windriver.com \
--to=zchen@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).