From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: maintain a generic child device for each rproc
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:35:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF5FA9B.4070003@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbZ+=MGU5juuOP+_vtUe4d_46j=Rd0cqYi7q2i-9T35R5w@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/02/12 12:54, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Great! It looks like device_type doesn't have any list iteration support
>> though. Is that requirement gone?
> Pretty much, yeah. I'll soon post a separate patch which removes the
> get_by_name functionality (together with its related klist).
>
>> Will you resend this as part of a series? It will be easier to review then.
> Not sure. There's a collection of discrete patches that I've been
> posting, but they really aren't an organic series: as long as the
> dependencies are met, each and every one of them is applicable even if
> applied alone.
>
> So I'd prefer (when possible) to treat patches in a discrete fashion
> so we can start applying them and unblock others who depend on them
> (e.g. Fernando's runtime PM work depends on this one).
>
> But if you prefer me to send this one patch differently to make it
> easier to review, let me know!
>
Ok then. Please add
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
It would be nice if you got an ack from Greg or Kay on the device_type
usage too.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 7:36 [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: maintain a generic child device for each rproc Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-05-26 7:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: remove the now-redundant kref Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-05-30 8:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-05-30 12:38 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-06-04 21:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-06-05 10:25 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 8:52 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 8:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-02 9:05 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-15 10:10 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-15 9:17 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-05-30 8:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: maintain a generic child device for each rproc Stephen Boyd
2012-05-30 12:16 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-06-04 21:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-06-29 8:13 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 19:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-02 19:54 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-05 20:35 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2012-07-15 9:12 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF5FA9B.4070003@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).