From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:52:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: ux500: Remove AB8500 regulator register initialisation information In-Reply-To: <20120706112317.GD4017@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1341493572-29735-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1341493572-29735-4-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <4FF6979F.2000904@linaro.org> <20120706112317.GD4017@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <4FF6D183.7040407@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/07/12 12:23, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:45:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >> Please take a note of this and also do not apply the regulator >> driver counterpart of the patch-set (it was one of the ones you >> Reviewed-by in the previous batch). > > I've no idea what patches you're talking about, sorry. Regarding patch: > [PATCH 08/15] regulator: Stop initialising AB8500's registers during bring-up On 20/06/12 14:19, Lee Jones wrote:> On 20/06/12 14:08, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:56:44PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >>> There is no need to initialise the AB8500's regulator registers, as >>> most of this work is already carried out by framework features. >> >> Does this have any dependency on the rest of the series? > > Unfortunately yes. > > It needs the "ARM: ux500:" stuff to go in first. Then you added your Reviewed-by: until the ux500 stuff goes in. However, the ux500 patch has been NACKed, so please don't take the aforementioned patch in either. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog