From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:28:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: ab8500: Clean-up the last two ab8500 related DT match tables In-Reply-To: <20120710091304.GU15345@sortiz-mobl> References: <1341578598-9307-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120710091304.GU15345@sortiz-mobl> Message-ID: <4FFC4A23.5000107@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/07/12 11:13, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:43:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> A patch was recently submitted to stop all ab8500 devices from >> being registered through Device Tree. Instead, only the db8500 >> will be DT:ed and the rest will continue to be registered via >> the MFD API, as they always were. >> >> Two patches have recently been applied which enable Device Tree >> probing; one for rtc-ab8500 and the other for ponkey-ab8500. >> These two need to be removed to prevent double-probing these >> devices with Device Tree is enabled. >> >> Cc: Samuel Ortiz >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >> --- >> drivers/input/misc/ab8500-ponkey.c | 8 -------- >> drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c | 6 ------ >> 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-) > I don't know against which tree you generated those patches, but none of those > 2 of_device_id arrays are in my for-next branch. So I can't apply this patch. I can rebase them on anything of your choosing. What is your for-next branch based on? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog