From: ldewangan@nvidia.com (Laxman Dewangan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dt: tegra: seaboard: add regulators
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:09:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFC5ACA.8010003@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120710154201.GE10022@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Tuesday 10 July 2012 09:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:34:24PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> The sample code for tps65910 is as follows. So where do you think
>> that it is wrong and what should be correct approach.
>> I need to follow the same for tps6586x also.
> Like I said the use of a supply name should be unconditional, you should
> just set the supply name in the descriptor.
>
if I set the desc.supply_name unconditional then if the entry of that
supply name is not there in the DT entry (on device node) then that
regulator will not get registered because the search for
supply_regulator will fail during registration.
I am setting the desc.supply only when there is supply entry in DT or if
it is from platform.
Do we need to make such supply pin entry as required inplace of optional?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-22 23:14 [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dt: tegra: seaboard: add regulators Stephen Warren
2012-06-22 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dt: tegra: ventana: " Stephen Warren
2012-06-22 23:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dt: tegra: paz00: " Stephen Warren
2012-06-23 16:35 ` Marc Dietrich
2012-06-24 11:03 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-24 12:01 ` Marc Dietrich
2012-06-24 12:31 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-24 13:27 ` Marc Dietrich
2012-06-25 8:46 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-25 10:45 ` Marc Dietrich
2012-06-25 11:07 ` Thierry Reding
2012-06-26 22:35 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-26 23:02 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-26 23:16 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-29 17:32 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-30 11:45 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-25 6:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dt: tegra: seaboard: " Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-25 15:12 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-25 15:24 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-25 15:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-25 22:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-25 23:09 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-26 6:38 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-26 8:52 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-10 11:59 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-07-10 13:44 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-10 13:44 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-07-10 13:53 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-10 15:04 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-07-10 15:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-10 16:39 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2012-07-10 16:52 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-10 16:53 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-07-10 17:01 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-11 10:02 ` Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFC5ACA.8010003@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).