From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Where to put a large bootloader-supplied device tree on ARM ?
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:34:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFF34C9.8030000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFE743B.6080504@firmworks.com>
[adding u-boot list]
On 07/12/2012 01:52 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 7/8/2012 6:30 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/6/2012 3:23 PM, David VomLehn (dvomlehn) wrote:
>>>> The kernel *must* go where it is linked, but the FDT contains only relative
>>>> references and is thus free to go anywhere. The same is true of ramdisks,
>>>> which
>>>> are usually placed after the kernel.
>>
>> The kernel must go where it is linked *only* if you are using the
>> 'Image' output. When using 'zImage' you can put the kernel anywhere in
>> memory, or in the first 128MB of RAM if CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR is used.
>>
>>> Right, but the kernel image is compressed, so after decompression it expands
>>> into the area just after it. Also, the .bss segment is in that vicinity.
>>
>> To be exact, the compressed kernel moves itself out of the region where
>> the decompressed kernel will end up before doing the decompression, but
>> only if necessary. So it is a good idea to load zImage away from the
>> decompressed kernel area to avoid this extra move and save some fraction
>> of a second on boot time.
>>
>>> There's some code in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S to relocate
>>> device tree blobs, but it requires CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB which
>>> is not recommended - arch/arm/Kconfig recommends using the
>>> documented boot protocol istead .
>>
>> This is in case a DTB is appended to zImage. When the DTB is detected,
>> the moving of zImage out of the decompressed area must take care of
>> moving the DTB as well.
>>
>>> Documentation/arm/Booting says
>>> to put the dtb "in a region of memory where the kernel decompressor
>>> will not overwrite it", further recommending the first 16KiB.
>>>
>>> As noted, the first 16KiB loses if the dtb is too large. And
>>> "where the kernel decompressor will not overwrite it" says what
>>> won't work, not what will. It appears that the decompressor works
>>> out its addresses dynamically, so there's no hard prescription even
>>> for what to avoid.
>>
>> A good rule of thumb is to take the size of the decompressed kernel and
>> multiply this by 3. Rounding up is also fine. So for example if your
>> arch/arm/boot/Image is 5MB, then putting anciliary data such as a
>> ramdisk or a large DTB from 16MB into RAM or above should be fine.
>>
>>> For now, I'm putting the initrd at the end of memory and the dtb
>>> below that. That seems to work, but I'm unsure whether or not
>>> I'm just "getting lucky".
>>
>> That's also perfectly fine.
>
>
> Alas, that worked for machines with 512 MiB of main memory, but failed
> on 1 GiB machines. My guess is that, when the initrd and dtb are near
> the top of a 1 GiB memory, the virtual address gets too near the top of
> the kernel's 1 GiB of virtual space (which starts at 0xc0000000),
> perhaps colliding with the VMALLOC space.
>
> Putting them just below the 128 MiB boundary seems to work.
Interesting. I think this is also a problem on u-boot just waiting to
happen. u-boot locates itself at the end of RAM and likes to copy the
fdt and initrd to just below that. Any machine with 1G+ is going to hit
this. I avoided it because I limited u-boot to 512MB on highbank.
Rob
>
>>
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 14:22 [PATCH v2 00/12] IRQ, GPIO SPI, I2C, etc DTC support Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ARM: Orion: DT support for IRQ and GPIO Controllers Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 8:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 9:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 9:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 10:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 10:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 10:11 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2012-07-05 10:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 10:38 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2012-07-05 11:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 11:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 12:09 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-07-05 12:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 13:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 13:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 13:33 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 13:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 12:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 13:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 13:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 13:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 15:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 14:14 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-07-05 14:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 14:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 15:51 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-07-05 16:30 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2012-07-05 16:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-06 20:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-06 21:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-07 0:24 ` Where to put a large bootloader-supplied device tree on ARM ? Mitch Bradley
2012-07-07 1:23 ` David VomLehn (dvomlehn)
2012-07-07 1:59 ` Mitch Bradley
2012-07-09 4:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-07-12 6:52 ` Mitch Bradley
2012-07-12 18:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-07-12 20:34 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-07-12 21:38 ` [U-Boot] " Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-12 21:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-07-13 1:28 ` Rob Herring
2012-07-13 6:45 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ARM: Orion: DT support for IRQ and GPIO Controllers Mitch Bradley
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] SPI: Refactor spi-orion to use SPI framework queue Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] spi-orion: remove uneeded spi_info Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] spi-orion: add device tree binding Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] ARM: kirkwood: use devicetree for orion-spi Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] ARM: kirkwood: use devicetree for SPI on dreamplug Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] I2C: MV64XXX: Add Device Tree support Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 15:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 16:58 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-04 19:49 ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-05 6:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] Kirkwood: Add basic device tree support for QNAP TS219 Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 15:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 17:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] ARM: Kirkwood: DTify the watchdog timer Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ATA: sata_mv: Add device tree support Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ARM: Kirkwood: Use DT to configure SATA device Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:52 ` Josh Coombs
2012-07-03 15:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] Crypto: CESA: Add support for DT based instantiation Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 15:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 17:03 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFF34C9.8030000@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).