From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>,
Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: dynamically allocate selftest device struct
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:02:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4af7c59e-bb1b-4b9e-a61d-90d911df430b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423164826.2931382-1-arnd@kernel.org>
On 2025-04-23 5:48 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> In general a 'struct device' is way too large to be put on the kernel
> stack. Apparently something just caused it to grow a slightly larger,
> which pushed the arm_lpae_do_selftests() function over the warning
> limit in some configurations:
>
> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c:1423:19: error: stack frame size (1032) exceeds limit (1024) in 'arm_lpae_do_selftests' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
> 1423 | static int __init arm_lpae_do_selftests(void)
> | ^
>
> Change the function to use a dynamically allocated faux_device
> instead of the on-stack device structure.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Fixes: ca25ec247aad ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Remove iommu_dev==NULL special case")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ab75a444-22a1-47f5-b3c0-253660395b5a@arm.com/
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> v2: use faux device instead of platform_device, as Robin suggested.
> The faux device is more appropriate here since the is no actual physical
> device, though on the other hand the v1 patch had the advantage of not
> actually needing to register the device.
> ---
> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> index 545229cf62d2..bbd42323c029 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/io-pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/device/faux.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> @@ -1437,15 +1438,17 @@ static int __init arm_lpae_do_selftests(void)
> };
>
> int i, j, k, pass = 0, fail = 0;
> - struct device dev;
> + struct faux_device *dev;
> struct io_pgtable_cfg cfg = {
> .tlb = &dummy_tlb_ops,
> .coherent_walk = true,
> - .iommu_dev = &dev,
> };
>
> - /* __arm_lpae_alloc_pages() merely needs dev_to_node() to work */
> - set_dev_node(&dev, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> + dev = faux_device_create("io-pgtable-test", NULL, 0);
> + if (!dev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cfg.iommu_dev = &dev->dev;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pgsize); ++i) {
> for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(address_size); ++j) {
> @@ -1465,6 +1468,8 @@ static int __init arm_lpae_do_selftests(void)
> }
>
> pr_info("selftest: completed with %d PASS %d FAIL\n", pass, fail);
> + faux_device_destroy(dev);
> +
> return fail ? -EFAULT : 0;
> }
> subsys_initcall(arm_lpae_do_selftests);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 16:48 [PATCH] [v2] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: dynamically allocate selftest device struct Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-23 17:02 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2025-04-28 11:21 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4af7c59e-bb1b-4b9e-a61d-90d911df430b@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox