Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: dma: arm-dma350: document generic and combined IRQ topologies

[Jun Guo <jun.guo@cixtech.com>]

On 3/23/2026 3:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> 
> On 23/03/2026 03:09, Jun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 3/20/2026 6:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>>
>>> On 20/03/2026 10:58, Peter Chen wrote:
>>>> On 26-03-20 10:43:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/03/2026 10:38, Peter Chen wrote:
>>>>>> On 26-03-20 10:12:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 06:17:21PM +0800, Jun Guo wrote:
>>>>>>>> Update the DMA-350 DT binding to match the current driver behavior.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Allow both:
>>>>>>>> - "arm,dma-350" as the generic compatible, and
>>>>>>>> - "cix,sky1-dma-350", "arm,dma-350" for SoC-specific fallback usage.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also document interrupt topology variants supported by hardware
>>>>>>>> integration:
>>>>>>>> - one combined interrupt for all channels, or
>>>>>>>> - one interrupt per channel (up to 8 channels).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch is Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wrong tag, please read carefully the guideline before using LLM tools.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is the trade off for coding-assistants.rst suggestion and
>>>>>> passing checkpatch.pl. Currently, checkpatch.pl reports the
>>>>>> error for tag without email address. So we choose to add tag
>>>>>> description at patch context.
>>>>>
>>>>> You still have to use correct tag.
>>>>
>>>> You mean even checkpatch.pl reports below error, we still add it
>>>> "Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex" as tag?
>>>
>>> Yes, after fixing the contents (that's not entirely correct format I
>>> think). Hopefully someone will fix checkpatch one day...
>> I cannot find any commit records referencing AI via "Co-developed-by" in
>> the latest kernel GitHub repository, and I also cannot locate any text
>> describing the correct way to cite AI in the submitting-patches.rst
>> file. In this case, how can I confirm the current correct format?
> 
> If you do not want to read coding with assistant guideline and follow
> its words, then please don't send code created with such tools. Do you
> even have full copyrights to send it here? What license was used by the
> tool to generate you this code?
Sorry, I overlooked the programming assistant guidelines. I will comply 
with the requirements of the programming assistant guidelines and 
resubmit a new patch.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Best regards,
Jun