From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:20:25 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] soc: samsung: Drivers for v4.11 In-Reply-To: References: <20170120181343.12570-1-krzk@kernel.org> Message-ID: <4be96fae-6790-d281-61dc-f7e7cde9efb7@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, On 2017-01-26 10:13, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Few changes in Exynos PMU driver including one that is needed by pinctrl >> driver for runtime PM. We want to move forward with the RPM for our drivers >> while keeping still DT ABI. >> >> This tag is also for Linus Walleij to pull - base for pinctrl changes. > Do I need it? I.e. will my branch not compile without this, or is this > just a runtime problem? "[PATCH v3 11/13] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from mach-exynos to the pinctrl driver" has compile time dependency on the changes included in that tag. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland