From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sed@free.fr (Cedric Roux) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:26:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: s3c24xx: formatting cleanup in mach-mini2440.c In-Reply-To: References: <20180907215446.15160-1-sed@free.fr> Message-ID: <4cf38559-b00d-ede4-def5-7cd832d8a506@free.fr> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 09/12/2018 09:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 23:54 +0200, Cedric Roux wrote: >> Running: >> scripts/checkpatch.pl -f arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c >> revealed several errors and warnings. >> >> They were all removed, except one which is an #if 0 around the declaration >> of a gpio pin. This needs some more investigation and I prefer to let it >> here. This is not some dead code. > [] >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c > [] >> @@ -674,17 +680,17 @@ static void __init mini2440_init(void) >> mini2440_fb_info.displays = >> &mini2440_lcd_cfg[features.lcd_index]; >> >> - printk(KERN_INFO "MINI2440: LCD"); >> + pr_info("MINI2440: LCD"); > > OK > >> for (li = 0; li < ARRAY_SIZE(mini2440_lcd_cfg); li++) >> if (li == features.lcd_index) >> - printk(" [%d:%dx%d]", li, >> + pr_info(" [%d:%dx%d]", li, >> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].width, >> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].height); > > pr_cont > >> else >> - printk(" %d:%dx%d", li, >> + pr_info(" %d:%dx%d", li, > > pr_cont > >> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].width, >> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].height); >> - printk("\n"); >> + pr_info("\n"); > > pr_cont > > So only the first printk should use pr_info(). > The subsequent printk uses should use pr_cont() at this point, I don't know what to do. Should I resubmit the patches? Or is it in the hands of Krzysztof (krzk at kernel.org)? I would say a git rebase -i is enough to edit the patch and this rebase is obviously not to be done by me, but I don't know the process. Regards, C?dric. > >> s3c24xx_fb_set_platdata(&mini2440_fb_info); >> } >>