From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:09:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5017F514.4030106@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120731145614.GZ4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 31/07/12 15:56, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:45:40PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> If a list of widgets is provided and one of them fails to be added as
>> a control, the present semantics fail all subsequent widgets. A better
>> solution would be to only fail that widget, but pursue in attempting
>> to add the rest of the list.
>
> To reiterate, this is in *no* way urgent or even a bug fix.
It fixes sound in our driver.
Without this the card failes to instantiate.
>> dev_err(dapm->dev,
>> "ASoC: Failed to create DAPM control %s\n",
>> widget->name);
>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - break;
>
> Indeed, removing the error return is a regression.
Isn't the return code incorrect? There are a multitude of reasons why
snd_soc_dapm_new_control() would fail. No-memory is just one of them, so
why do we force this probable lie?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-31 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 14:45 [PATCH 0/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:56 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 15:09 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-07-31 15:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements Lee Jones
2012-07-31 15:38 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5017F514.4030106@linaro.org \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).