[PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support

[ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches)]

Le 08/08/2012 05:14 AM, Chris Ball a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
>> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
>> Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
>> cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
>
> In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
> receive into the patches when you resend them.  Thanks!
>

Ok.

>> I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
>> documented and it will concern all drivers.
>
> Agreed.  It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.
>
>> Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
>> isn't it?
>
> Yes, let's do that.  I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
> can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.

Thanks Chris.

Ludovic

>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
>