From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAC0CD1297 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2025 22:16:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=byT23yRuymPPdxIdTw9swgQHBmcIsr3XjUFDrG55fV8=; b=p0wAXLrQc4tHznVQjwG8QTMRhL JQXTguprDwom68s8nnAVLxTcg2qVtHM5pNshWi3Lx34aOiyiXb+ISrITFzoeSkV0yNPQQVP15lGXJ czB4SJqdkudXX558+HlKAmxInigUt4CzhWPWm5cfjRoa5u8z8ZHSYfXZo7AawY98r+RT9lThLc3AV qQ1YUjq55BKnUrKFBYc7s4/gOrN6N/z42L3rLOhSmb1yb6Pu07msfieeA3aeM6OlGF27Q5EPoWpCg BwlC4A/MVH1HJebOtN2zbm3yljW0/bOVmXHYF7qpOv7ur9U/RPKlGy9UBvLVs4dXoDxEK4iMlvRRy zmGhmxKA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vIDiG-00000004Qlm-1yMn; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 22:16:44 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vIDiE-00000004Qkg-1qH7; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 22:16:43 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=byT23yRuymPPdxIdTw9swgQHBmcIsr3XjUFDrG55fV8=; b=UeTugOV+E0hXGyFevS5N0iiGGy Z04TlC1xumdZH+nmT/wlZcT6VB2EYFmR5T6N9pMYBtx76N4ewTk6uMCuHCsiWKrcR7XySmYklHaMC hHfkllprfyx2azRK9MI2rzFID9QWqakDL9f1eOVT8TS9jPoT337W+xY/HjDHO9ieBL5qCUzrPvBgf X9eLxHb7W+PcihWt40WJDr/4r2+jbqR8aUuVVwzuOvHzKgV20FBx3jq7hJiLizl94tWjQIeuJ4G5D by/ZGccOPc4ibNr6sXwPMx4McXn/3OHYx/1i/E0HK7JB9sMgWWwefHd1UP2X2WbX1RaYGCmouKCjg evGZ3JHw==; Received: from i53875a5e.versanet.de ([83.135.90.94] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vIDhv-0007Wr-0V; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:16:23 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Diederik de Haas , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Samuel Holland , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: hrdl , phantomas , Dragan Simic , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify usb-c-connector port on rk3566-pinenote Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:16:22 +0100 Message-ID: <5024969.GXAFRqVoOG@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20251109-rk3566-pinenote-dt-fixes-upstream-v1-0-ed38d200cc04@cknow-tech.com> <20251109-rk3566-pinenote-dt-fixes-upstream-v1-1-ed38d200cc04@cknow-tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251109_141642_498336_2B29957B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Sonntag, 9. November 2025, 18:37:26 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Normalzeit sc= hrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 09/11/2025 18:05, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > The USB-C connector on the PineNote has only 1 port, so there's no need > > for a 'ports' node with address-/size-cells properties as a single > > 'port' node suffices. > >=20 > > This fixes the following DT validation issue: > >=20 > > Warning (graph_child_address): /i2c@fe5c0000/tcpc@60/connector/ports: > > graph node has single child node 'port@0', > > #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary >=20 > This is not a DT validation, but DTC warning which we do not really fix. That is good to know. Is the same true for other dtc warnings? Thanks Heiko