From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:42:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5027740.B7iVUcUX2T@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403019164-12514-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 17:32:44 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
> platform device that binds to a dedicated driver. However in certain use
> cases it is desirable to make a device used with another driver a syscon
> interface provider. For example, certain SoCs (e.g. Exynos) contain
> system controller blocks which perform various functions such as power
> domain control, CPU power management, low power mode control, but in
> addition contain certain IP integration glue, such as various signal
> masks, coprocessor power control, etc. In such case, there is a need to
> have a dedicated driver for such system controller but also share
> registers with other drivers. The latter is where the syscon interface
> is helpful.
>
> This patch decouples syscon object from syscon driver, so that it can be
> registered from any driver in addition to the original "syscon" platform
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Hi Tomasz,
This seems like a reasonable way of solving the problem, but I think
there is an even better one that we have about in the past: if we
promote syscon from a platform driver into a a drivers/base/ helper
that is independent of the platform device matching, we can use
call syscon_regmap_lookup_* for any device node, whether it's already
bound to a driver or not, which do what you need. It would also make
it easier to call the syscon code before the platform_device
infrastructure gets initialized, which is something a number of
people have asked for, e.g. for using regmap to do SMP bringup
or for clock registration.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-10 6:56 [PATCH v4 00/11] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine_ops as static Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-10 11:43 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-10 11:46 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-17 3:48 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Move SYSREG definition into sys-reg specific file Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove file path from comment section Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove regs-pmu.h header dependency from pm_domain Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for mapping PMU base address via DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-10 17:10 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-17 6:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-17 15:26 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-17 15:32 ` [PATCH RFC] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices Tomasz Figa
2014-06-17 15:42 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-06-17 21:26 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-18 8:26 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-24 11:03 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-18 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-19 0:06 ` Michal Simek
2014-07-28 4:15 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove "linux/bug.h" from pmu.c Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Refactored code for using PMU address via DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-17 16:02 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Move "mach/map.h" inclusion from regs-pmu.h to platsmp.c Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-17 16:04 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-17 17:12 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-24 11:28 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 0:11 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-25 4:30 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-10 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Move PMU specific definitions from common.h Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-27 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Vikas Sajjan
2014-05-30 11:58 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5027740.B7iVUcUX2T@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox