linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wade_farnsworth@mentor.com (Wade Farnsworth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: support syscall tracing
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:21:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <502C04CF.2080409@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502BFA08.6010708@mentor.com>

Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 05:58:44PM +0100, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
>>> We need to set current_thread_info()->syscall, since it's used in the
>>> call to syscall_get_nr() in perf_syscall_{enter,exit}.
>>
>> Damn. I think that also means we have a bug, given that the SYSCALL_TRACE
>> code can set this to -1, which gets used as an index into a bitmap by the
>> looks of it. Considering that we have to pass the syscall number to
>> trace_sys_enter anyway, it also seems broken.
>>
>
> I agree. Looking at the other architectures, it seems the analogous
> function to ptrace_syscall_trace can return -1 under certain
> circumstances, but the original syscall value should be passed onto
> trace_sys_enter and returned from syscall_get_nr(). So, I'm thinking
> that we should modify our behavior accordingly. What this means for us
> is that we never store -1 in the thread_info syscall field, and then
> pass that into trace_sys_enter instead of the ptrace_syscall_trace
> return value. Do you see any problems with this approach?
>

Hmm, on closer inspection it looks that perf_syscall_enter is broken. 
ftrace_syscall_enter correctly returns if result of a syscall_get_nr is 
negative.  The perf version omits the check for negative values. 
Furthermore, the value of syscall_get_nr() should be -1 if it's not 
called when not in a syscall.  So storing the -1 in the thread_info 
syscall field is not necessarily wrong.  Still, I think the value we 
pass into trace_sys_enter should be the actual syscall number, i.e. the 
value of scno.

>>> What about moving the setting of ->syscall to
>>> syscall_trace_{enter,exit}? That would preserve ptrace_syscall_trace()
>>> for the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE case only, but ensure that the field is set
>>> the TRACEPOINT case as well. Thoughts?
>>
>> I'd be tempted to set the thing unconditionally before checking the
>> thread
>> flag at the top of ptrace_syscall_trace. This hangs off the slowpath
>> anyway
>> and it makes everything a lot more readable.
>>
>
> OK, I'll make that change.
>
> Wade

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-15 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-15 15:14 [PATCH v2] ARM: support syscall tracing Wade Farnsworth
2012-08-15 16:21 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-15 16:58   ` Wade Farnsworth
2012-08-15 17:27     ` Will Deacon
2012-08-15 19:35       ` Wade Farnsworth
2012-08-15 20:21         ` Wade Farnsworth [this message]
2012-08-16  9:54           ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 14:33             ` Wade Farnsworth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=502C04CF.2080409@mentor.com \
    --to=wade_farnsworth@mentor.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).