From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com (Shinya Kuribayashi) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:23:56 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: export read_current_timer In-Reply-To: <20120822175810.GT9093@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1345645780-2749-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1345645780-2749-2-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <503513A2.1030002@codeaurora.org> <20120822174945.GS9093@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <50351D80.6010600@codeaurora.org> <20120822175810.GT9093@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <5035B05C.4020104@renesas.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 8/23/2012 2:58 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 08/22/12 10:49, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On the topic of the timer stuff: Shinya/Stephen, did you have a chance to >>> look at the registration stuff that was proposed? I'm happy to push it if >>> people will actually use it. >> >> Yes I have tested it on our internal trees and it looks good. I plan to >> send a patch to move MSM's timers over to it later this week so that we >> have at least two users upstream. And I think other A9 MPcore platforms, namely OMAP and EXYNOS, would also be candidates, who tried to skip calibrate_delay() in the past (OMAP) or currently provide non-smp_twd timers as localtimers (EXYNOS). I may miss the latest status of those BSPs, but believe that we would have more users (>2) in the future. > Awesome, I'll dust that series off at -rc3 then. It works for me for weeks without troubles, looking forward to it. -- Shinya Kuribayashi Renesas Electronics