From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: JFFS2 issue with v3.5.x and later on Atmel chips at least
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:05:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5035F266.2040909@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345707689.2848.203.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Hi Artem,
Le 08/23/2012 09:41 AM, Artem Bityutskiy a ?crit :
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:07 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] JFFS2: fix unmount regression
>
> This patch fixes regression introduced by
> "8bdc81c jffs2: get rid of jffs2_sync_super". We submit a delayed work in order
> to make sure the write-buffer is synchronized at some point. But we do not
> flush it when we unmount, which causes an oops when we unmount the file-system
> and then the delayed work is executed.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by adding a "cancel_delayed_work_sync()" infocation
> in the '->sync_fs()' handler. This will make sure the delayed work is canceled
> on sync, unmount and re-mount. And because VFS always callse 'sync_fs()' before
> unmounting or remounting, this fixes the issue.
>
> Reported-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org [3.5+]
> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Ludovic, would you please give this patch a test? Also attached.
>
Thanks for your reactivity. I tested your patch on sam9m10g45 with 3.5
and 3.5.2 and it fixes the issue.
Tested-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> fs/jffs2/super.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jffs2/super.c b/fs/jffs2/super.c
> index 61ea413..e385fa3 100644
> --- a/fs/jffs2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/super.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ static int jffs2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> {
> struct jffs2_sb_info *c = JFFS2_SB_INFO(sb);
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER))
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&c->wbuf_dwork);
> +
> mutex_lock(&c->alloc_sem);
> jffs2_flush_wbuf_pad(c);
> mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 10:28 Kernel oops since v3.5.x on Atmel chips ludovic.desroches
2012-08-22 15:00 ` JFFS2 issue with v3.5.x and later on Atmel chips at least (was: Kernel oops since v3.5.x on Atmel chips) ludovic.desroches
2012-08-23 6:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-23 7:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-23 9:05 ` ludovic.desroches [this message]
2012-08-23 12:37 ` JFFS2 issue with v3.5.x and later on Atmel chips at least Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5035F266.2040909@atmel.com \
--to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).