From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: CMA page migration failure due to buffers on bh_lru
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:46:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504122BE.8080706@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503EBBD6.5080504@codeaurora.org>
On 8/29/2012 6:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> My quick and dirty workaround for testing is to remove the GFP_MOVABLE
> flag from find_or_create_page but this seems significantly less than
> optimal. Ideally, it seems like the buffers should be evicted from the
> LRU when trying to drop (expand on invalid_bh_lru?) but I'm not familiar
> enough with the code path to know if this is a good approach.
>
> Any suggestions/feedback is appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Laura
I came up with what I think is a reasonable fix to this. Feedback is
appreciated. Thanks.
Laura
8<---
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index ad5938c..daa0c3d 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1399,12 +1399,49 @@ static bool has_bh_in_lru(int cpu, void *dummy)
return 0;
}
+static void __evict_bh_lru(void *arg)
+{
+ struct bh_lru *b = &get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
+ struct buffer_head *bh = arg;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BH_LRU_SIZE; i++) {
+ if (b->bhs[i] == bh) {
+ brelse(b->bhs[i]);
+ b->bhs[i] = NULL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+out:
+ put_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
+}
+
+static bool bh_exists_in_lru(int cpu, void *arg)
+{
+ struct bh_lru *b = per_cpu_ptr(&bh_lrus, cpu);
+ struct buffer_head *bh = arg;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BH_LRU_SIZE; i++) {
+ if (b->bhs[i] == bh)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+}
void invalidate_bh_lrus(void)
{
on_each_cpu_cond(has_bh_in_lru, invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(invalidate_bh_lrus);
+void evict_bh_lrus(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ on_each_cpu_cond(bh_exists_in_lru, __evict_bh_lru, bh, 1, GFP_ATOMIC);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(evict_bh_lrus);
+
void set_bh_page(struct buffer_head *bh,
struct page *page, unsigned long offset)
{
@@ -3052,6 +3089,7 @@ drop_buffers(struct page *page, struct buffer_head
**buffers_to_free)
bh = head;
do {
+ evict_bh_lrus(bh);
if (buffer_write_io_error(bh) && page->mapping)
set_bit(AS_EIO, &page->mapping->flags);
if (buffer_busy(bh))
--
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-31 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 1:03 CMA page migration failure due to buffers on bh_lru Laura Abbott
2012-08-31 20:46 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504122BE.8080706@codeaurora.org \
--to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).