From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mkl@pengutronix.de (Marc Kleine-Budde) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:42:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] can: c_can: Adopt pinctrl support In-Reply-To: <331ABD5ECB02734CA317220B2BBEABC13EA2630A@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> References: <1346673139-14540-1-git-send-email-anilkumar@ti.com> <1346673139-14540-2-git-send-email-anilkumar@ti.com> <5045161C.4000100@pengutronix.de> <331ABD5ECB02734CA317220B2BBEABC13EA2630A@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <5045B0D9.6060003@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/04/2012 08:14 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:12:04, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 09/03/2012 01:52 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote: >>> Adopt pinctrl support to c_can driver based on c_can device >>> pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to d_can mode >>> according to definitions provided in .dts file. >>> >>> In device specific device tree file 'pinctrl-names = "default";' >>> and 'pinctrl-0 = <&d_can1_pins>;' needs to add to configure pins >>> from c_can driver. d_can1_pins node contains the pinmux/config >>> details of d_can L/H pins. >> >> Looks good, is the pinctrl property documented in the dt bindings already? >> > > Yes, its here Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.txt Sorry, I meant not the generic pinctrl, but the c_can/d_can bindings documentation (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/). Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 259 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: