From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gcembed@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?R2HDq3RhbiBDYXJsaWVy?=)
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:50:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM : i.MX27 : split code for allocation of ressources
 of camera and eMMA
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5DyjdrZYNDMuT1=yuxQcHuP3=6dy_j_ja1vub56_m3pvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1346763398-13536-1-git-send-email-gcembed@gmail.com>
 <CACKLOr0PO1jbxrfRoEwEAGFNkNkAFUA-oB2vLZpw1kDxEYPBQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5047013E.30508@gmail.com>
 <CACKLOr1RipM3QVJBaTjXHFotqSMdrCsWLkBsgiiuauTWpxR6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <50471187.3040809@gmail.com>
 <CACKLOr0=TccMNoQV-LfkeBrCN5=0E8eqTEaT7PRk-KAv_mQ5RQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <50471CEE.60606@gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5D7DrUwg1YYwPnXgMj4nsgS=2ctnb7J3n-60hkreoP3yw@mail.gmail.com>
 <504769CF.2070904@gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5DyjdrZYNDMuT1=yuxQcHuP3=6dy_j_ja1vub56_m3pvA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <504774B7.8090007@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/05/2012 05:29 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Ga?tan Carlier <gcembed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> With or without my patch ? I have burnt out my ov2640 while previous
>
> Without your patch. Just running a clean linux-next-20120905.
I also notice a difference between previous release. Before, if CMOS was 
not scanned on I2C, soc-camera failed to init.
With this release, soc-camera driver loads and create dev node even when 
nothing is connected on I2C bus.
>
>> experimentation so it is hard for me to test that and I have to write driver
>> for MT9V111 to be able to test soc-camera on Kernel 3.x.
>
> Write a driver? There is already one: drivers/media/i2c/mt9v011.c
MT9V011 is not compatible with MT9V111. MT9V111 uses two address spaces 
for register : Sensor Core registers and IFP registers. Another MT9* 
driver works with two address spaces but this is for a HD sensor and the 
function of registers is different.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabio Estevam
>
Regards,
Ga?tan Carlier.