From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:47:13 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp_twd: reprogram twd based on clk notifier In-Reply-To: <1347005967-7604-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> References: <1347005967-7604-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> Message-ID: <5050F4D1.5020700@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/07/2012 02:19 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > From: Mike Turquette > > Running cpufreq driver on imx6q, the following warning is seen. > > $ BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:269 ... > It looks that the warning is caused by that twd_update_frequency() gets > called from an atomic context while it calls clk_get_rate() where > a mutex gets held. > > To fix the warning, let's convert the existing code to use clk notifiers > in place of CPUfreq notifiers. This works out nicely for Cortex-A9 > MPcore designs that scale all CPUs at the same frequency. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo At least in next-20120912, this doesn't appear to cause any issue on either Tegra20 or Tegra30. I'm copying Prashant to verify this is OK for Tegra. For reference, the situation for Tegra is: Pre-3.7: Tegra20: Does not use common clock, and there is NO "smp_twd" clock defined. Tegra30: Does not use common clock, and there IS a "smp_twd" clock defined. In 3.7 will be: Tegra20: Supports common clock, but there is NO "smp_twd" clock defined. Tegra30: Supports common clock, and there IS a "smp_twd" clock defined. I believe Prashant will be sending a patch very soon to define an "smp_twd" clock for Tegra20. The Tegra cpufreq driver currently only initializes on Tegra20 and not Tegra30 right now due to some clock-naming differences. I don't expect this to change in 3.7, but who knows, someone might send a patch in the next 2 days or so... > --- > arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 32 +++++++++++++------------------- > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c > index fef42b2..635e3ea 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c > @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -96,51 +95,46 @@ static void twd_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *clk) > disable_percpu_irq(clk->irq); > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ > - > /* > * Updates clockevent frequency when the cpu frequency changes. > * Called on the cpu that is changing frequency with interrupts disabled. > */ > -static void twd_update_frequency(void *data) > +static void twd_update_frequency(void *new_rate) > { > - twd_timer_rate = clk_get_rate(twd_clk); > + twd_timer_rate = *((unsigned long *) new_rate); > > clockevents_update_freq(*__this_cpu_ptr(twd_evt), twd_timer_rate); > } > > -static int twd_cpufreq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb, > - unsigned long state, void *data) > +static int twd_rate_change(struct notifier_block *nb, > + unsigned long flags, void *data) > { > - struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs = data; > + struct clk_notifier_data *cnd = data; > > /* > * The twd clock events must be reprogrammed to account for the new > * frequency. The timer is local to a cpu, so cross-call to the > * changing cpu. > */ > - if (state == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE || state == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE) > - smp_call_function_single(freqs->cpu, twd_update_frequency, > - NULL, 1); > + if (flags == POST_RATE_CHANGE) > + smp_call_function(twd_update_frequency, > + (void *)&cnd->new_rate, 1); > > return NOTIFY_OK; > } > > -static struct notifier_block twd_cpufreq_nb = { > - .notifier_call = twd_cpufreq_transition, > +static struct notifier_block twd_clk_nb = { > + .notifier_call = twd_rate_change, > }; > > -static int twd_cpufreq_init(void) > +static int twd_clk_init(void) > { > if (twd_evt && *__this_cpu_ptr(twd_evt) && !IS_ERR(twd_clk)) > - return cpufreq_register_notifier(&twd_cpufreq_nb, > - CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); > + return clk_notifier_register(twd_clk, &twd_clk_nb); > > return 0; > } > -core_initcall(twd_cpufreq_init); > - > -#endif > +core_initcall(twd_clk_init); > > static void __cpuinit twd_calibrate_rate(void) > { >