From: tushar.behera@linaro.org (Tushar Behera)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: Use spin_lock_{irqsave, irqrestore} in clk_set_rate
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:32:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5052BA5C.2040900@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346998102-5317-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org>
Ping !
On 09/07/2012 11:38 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
> The spinlock clocks_lock can be held during ISR, hence it is not safe to
> hold that lock with disabling interrupts.
>
> It fixes following potential deadlock.
>
> =========================================================
> [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
> 3.6.0-rc4+ #2 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/0/1 just changed the state of lock:
> (&(&host->lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<c027fb0d>] sdhci_irq+0x15/0x564
> but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
> (clocks_lock){+.+...}
>
> and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(clocks_lock);
> local_irq_disable();
> lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock);
> lock(clocks_lock);
> <Interrupt>
> lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c
> index 65c5eca..9b71719 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>
> int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> int ret;
>
> if (IS_ERR(clk))
> @@ -159,9 +160,9 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> if (clk->ops == NULL || clk->ops->set_rate == NULL)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - spin_lock(&clocks_lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&clocks_lock, flags);
> ret = (clk->ops->set_rate)(clk, rate);
> - spin_unlock(&clocks_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clocks_lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
>
--
Tushar Behera
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 6:08 [PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: Use spin_lock_{irqsave, irqrestore} in clk_set_rate Tushar Behera
2012-09-14 5:02 ` Tushar Behera [this message]
2012-09-17 11:25 ` [PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: Use spin_lock_{irqsave,irqrestore} " Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5052BA5C.2040900@linaro.org \
--to=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).