From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 22:18:10 +0400 Subject: [PATCH v4 12/24] xen/arm: introduce CONFIG_XEN on ARM In-Reply-To: <1347621207-11294-12-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> References: <1347621207-11294-12-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Message-ID: <505374E2.5080308@mvista.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 09/14/2012 03:13 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Changes in v2: > - mark Xen guest support on ARM as EXPERIMENTAL. > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 2f88d8d..e92518d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -1897,6 +1897,16 @@ config DEPRECATED_PARAM_STRUCT > This was deprecated in 2001 and announced to live on for 5 years. > Some old boot loaders still use this way. > > +config XEN_DOM0 > + def_bool y > + > +config XEN > + bool "Xen guest support on ARM (EXPERIMENTAL)" > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && ARM && OF > + select XEN_DOM0 What's the point of selecting it if it's always "y"? WBR, Sergei