From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:07:37 +0400 Subject: [PATCH v4 12/24] xen/arm: introduce CONFIG_XEN on ARM In-Reply-To: References: <1347621207-11294-12-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <505374E2.5080308@mvista.com> Message-ID: <50571289.3040509@mvista.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 17-09-2012 14:57, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> Changes in v2: >>> - mark Xen guest support on ARM as EXPERIMENTAL. >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini >>> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >>> --- >>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >>> index 2f88d8d..e92518d 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >>> @@ -1897,6 +1897,16 @@ config DEPRECATED_PARAM_STRUCT >>> This was deprecated in 2001 and announced to live on for 5 years. >>> Some old boot loaders still use this way. >>> >>> +config XEN_DOM0 >>> + def_bool y >>> + >>> +config XEN >>> + bool "Xen guest support on ARM (EXPERIMENTAL)" >>> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && ARM && OF >>> + select XEN_DOM0 >> What's the point of selecting it if it's always "y"? > That's because on X86 is not always "y": there are things under > drivers/xen that compile on both platforms and depend on XEN_DOM0. But we're not on x86. On ARM this select is pointless. WBR, Sergei