From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:33:21 -0700 Subject: ARM: smp: why don't eliminate warning "Unknown IPI message 0x1"? In-Reply-To: <20120918093853.GW12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120918093853.GW12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <5058B061.5020902@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/18/12 02:38, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:07:49PM +0800, ??? wrote: >> Russell King want people to move to SGI0 for this, so that we can have SGI1-N >> as the proper IPIs, but now we can't do this, maybe we must wait for >> so many years. >> But, Do you think we can use a another way to resolve this problem, >> because this warning message will oftenly appeare in products. >> >> We can't assume the fixed IPI number that can wakeup secondary cores. >> "I'd much rather see platforms deciding whether they need to use SGI1 >> or whether they can switch to SGI0 instead." > Why not just fix your platform to use SGI0. I think we're _finally_ > there with everyone using SGI0, which means we can commit the patch > which fixes this. > Yes. I'm going to put it in the patch tracker now. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1433931/ -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation