From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason.wessel@windriver.com (Jason Wessel) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:57:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v7 0/11] KGDB/KDB FIQ (NMI) debugger In-Reply-To: <20120917155408.GA302@kroah.com> References: <20120913150133.GA16238@lizard> <20120917113750.GA28838@kroah.com> <50571ADF.3000406@windriver.com> <20120917125427.GA23516@kroah.com> <20120917153943.GA7510@lizard> <20120917155408.GA302@kroah.com> Message-ID: <5059B324.70409@windriver.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/17/2012 10:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 05:54:27AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> [...] >>>>> To make it easier, can I just take the tty driver patches now? Will >>>>> that break anything? >>>> I have not made my way through the entire series yet, so I am not sure >>>> if you need the kdb header changes or not, but so far it looks like >>>> the tty pieces are separate. If you add your ack Greg, I'll take the >>>> whole series and merge it into kgdb-next, or after I finish the review >>>> we could do it the other way around. >>> Your tree is fine: >>> >>> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman >>> >>> Let me know if you have problems merging this due to any tty patches, >>> and if so, I'll be glad to take them through my tree. >> Guys, thanks for taking a look into this! >> >> The patch that adds nmi console driver (i.e. tty/serial/kgdb_nmi.c) >> depends on the first KDB patches in these series, and it depends on >> amba-pl1011 and tty_port work, which is in tty-next. >> >> So, the series have to go via tty-next; I believe Jason won't able >> to take it via his tree. > Ok, I'll wait for Jason to review them. Jason, let me know how it > goes... > Other than 1, 2 and 7. They all get: Acked-by: Jason Wessel I ran out of time to review things yesterday, but it is all reviewed now. After we get some more comments from Anton, we can move forward. Cheers, Jason.