From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:22:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: dove: Fix tauros2 device tree init In-Reply-To: <1348531338-16624-3-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> References: <1348531338-16624-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <1348531338-16624-3-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5061073C.4010002@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/25/2012 02:02 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > During the review process of dove DT patches, Tauros2 cache > init call was changed and DT support added. This patch fixes > the call to Tauros2 init and adds a DT node. Moreover, plat/irq.h > include was missing from mach-dove/common.c. > ... > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c > index b37bef1..343a4bc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include "common.h" > @@ -399,7 +400,7 @@ static void __init dove_dt_init(void) > (dove_tclk + 499999) / 1000000); > > #ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_TAUROS2 > - tauros2_init(); > + tauros2_init(0); > #endif > dove_setup_cpu_mbus(); > I thought about the importance of the individual patches and except 2/6 all can wait for the next release cycle if too late. But 2/6 is important because the change in tauros2_init breaks build on dove. Sebastian