From: zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: Davinci: pcm: add support for sram-support-less platforms
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:42:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506AEF57.2000306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506ACACE.4030308@ti.com>
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also agree that ifdef is not a good solution.
>>>> It is better to have this information passed as device_data and via DT it can
>>>> be decided based on the compatible property for the device.
>>>
>>> That's not really the problem here - the problem is that the APIs used
>>> to get the SRAM are DaVinci only so it's not possible to build on OMAP
>>> or other platforms. The SRAM code needs to move to a standard API.
>>
>> What about following Matt Porter's idea and ignore the SRAM code
>> entirely and port the entire PCM code to generic dmaengine code first?
>> The EDMA driver needs to learn support for cyclic DMA for that, and I
>> might give that a try in near future.
>>
>> Later on, the SRAM ping-pong code can get added back using genalloc
>> functions, as Sekhar proposed. That needs to be done by someone who has
>> access to a Davinci board though, I only have a AM33xx/OMAP here.
>
> We cannot "get rid" of SRAM code and add it back "later". It is required
> for most DaVinci parts. The SRAM code can be converted to use genalloc
> (conversion should be straightforward and I can help test it) and the
> code that uses SRAM can probably keep using the private EDMA API till
> the dmaengine EDMA driver has cyclic DMA support. Matt has already
> posted patches to move private EDMA APIs to a common location. That
> should keep AM335x build from breaking. Is this something that is feasible?
Yes - by "later" I just meant in a subsequent patch. But you're probably
right, we can also do that first.
I'm looking at that right now and the problem seems that we don't have a
sane way to dynamically look up gen_pools independently of the actual
run-time platform. All users of gen_pools seem to know which platform
they run on and access a platform-specific pool. So I don't currently
see how we could implement multi-platform code, gen_pools are fine but
don't solve the problem here.
Would it be an idea to add a char* member to gen_pools and a function
that can be used to dynamically look it up again? If a buffer with a
certain name exists, we can use it and install that ping-pong buffer,
otherwise we just don't. While that would be easy to do, it's a
tree-wide change.
Is there a better way that I miss?
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-02 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-31 12:50 [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: Davinci: McASP: add support new McASP IP Variant Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-08-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-09-01 0:44 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-03 6:57 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-09-05 4:01 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: Davinci: pcm: add support for sram-support-less platforms Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-09-12 7:50 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-09-12 7:52 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-22 15:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-27 6:57 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-10-01 15:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-02 7:48 ` [alsa-devel] " Peter Ujfalusi
2012-10-02 9:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-02 10:33 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-02 11:06 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-02 13:42 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2012-10-02 16:41 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-02 16:50 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-02 17:28 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 9:21 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-04 9:38 ` Porter, Matt
2012-10-04 9:57 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-04 10:28 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 11:11 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-02 16:30 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-02 16:28 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-02 8:37 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-08-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: Davinci: evm: Fix typo in cpu dai name Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-09-01 0:47 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-02 22:28 ` [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: Davinci: McASP: add support new McASP IP Variant Daniel Mack
2012-10-03 7:16 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-10-03 11:16 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-03 12:57 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-10-03 14:07 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-04 19:50 ` Matt Porter
2012-11-25 10:26 ` Yegor Yefremov
2012-11-26 11:32 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-11-26 11:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-26 11:42 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-11-26 11:57 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506AEF57.2000306@gmail.com \
--to=zonque@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).