From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:49:21 -0700 Subject: arm-soc maintainer entry In-Reply-To: References: <506D4BCD.3020402@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <506DDA31.9010503@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/04/12 09:55, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Is the arm at kernel.org alias going to be added into the MAINTAINERS file? >> Should anybody be sending mails to this address? >> >> It seems I asked this over a year ago and the response was positive but >> nothing ever happened[1]. Maybe something like below? I only ask because >> get_maintainer.pl isn't picking up this email. > I've been holding off re-proposing this, mostly because life is easier > for us if we don't get arm at kernel.org cc:d on every single patch by > people who run get_maintainers.pl -- it's the equivalent of getting > linux-arm-kernel cc:d to your inbox. It's better signal-to-noise ratio > if it's mostly platform maintainers that email us on that address with > pull requests or patches they want applied. > > But yeah, it also means that the maintainer structure is undocumented. > I'm open for suggestions. > Thanks for clarifying. Maybe we can put in the git tree and no email address? That at least documents some structure. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation