From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: alignment faults in 3.6
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:04:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506E4E23.4020803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG5Tg6V0Vj9HTy3=AU-q+Qa3DuJs6R1Kw+3uOWU_jOGfkgyXzw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/04/2012 09:25 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 5 October 2012 02:56, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/04/2012 08:26 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>>> On 5 October 2012 01:58, Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On 5 October 2012 12:10, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I've been scratching my head with a "scheduling while atomic" bug I
>>>>> started seeing on 3.6. I can easily reproduce this problem when doing a
>>>>> wget on my system. It ultimately seems to be a combination of factors.
>>>>> The "scheduling while atomic" bug is triggered in do_alignment which
>>>>> gets triggered by this code in net/ipv4/af_inet.c, line 1356:
>>>>>
>>>>> id = ntohl(*(__be32 *)&iph->id);
>>>>> flush = (u16)((ntohl(*(__be32 *)iph) ^ skb_gro_len(skb)) | (id ^ IP_DF));
>>>>> id >>= 16;
>>>>>
>>>>> This code compiles into this using "gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro
>>>>> 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)":
>>>>>
>>>>> c02ac020: e8920840 ldm r2, {r6, fp}
>>>>> c02ac024: e6bfbf3b rev fp, fp
>>>>> c02ac028: e6bf6f36 rev r6, r6
>>>>> c02ac02c: e22bc901 eor ip, fp, #16384 ; 0x4000
>>>>> c02ac030: e0266008 eor r6, r6, r8
>>>>> c02ac034: e18c6006 orr r6, ip, r6
>>>>>
>>>>> which generates alignment faults on the ldm. These are silent until this
>>>>> commit is applied:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rob. I assume that iph is something like:
>>>>
>>>> struct foo {
>>>> u32 x;
>>>> char id[8];
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct foo *iph;
>>>>
>>>> GCC merged the two adjacent loads of x and id into one ldm. This is
>>>> an ARM specific optimisation done in load_multiple_sequence() and
>>>> enabled with -fpeephole2.
>>>>
>>>> I think the assembly is correct - GCC knows that iph is aligned and
>>>> knows the offsets of both x and id. Happy to be corrected if I'm
>>>> wrong, but I think the assembly is valid given the C code.
>>>
>>> The struct looks like this:
>>>
>>> struct iphdr {
>>> #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
>>> __u8 ihl:4,
>>> version:4;
>>> #elif defined (__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
>>> __u8 version:4,
>>> ihl:4;
>>> #else
>>> #error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
>>> #endif
>>> __u8 tos;
>>> __be16 tot_len;
>>> __be16 id;
>>> __be16 frag_off;
>>> __u8 ttl;
>>> __u8 protocol;
>>> __sum16 check;
>>> __be32 saddr;
>>> __be32 daddr;
>>> /*The options start here. */
>>> };
>>>
>>> In a normal build (there's some magic for special checkers) __be32 is a plain
>>> __u32 so the struct should be at least 4-byte aligned. If somehow it is not,
>>> that is the real bug.
>>
>> This struct is the IP header, so a struct ptr is just set to the
>> beginning of the received data. Since ethernet headers are 14 bytes,
>> often the IP header is not aligned unless the NIC can place the frame at
>> a 2 byte offset (which is something I need to investigate). So this
>> function cannot make any assumptions about the alignment. Does the ABI
>> define structs have some minimum alignment? Does the struct need to be
>> declared as packed or something?
>
> The ABI defines the alignment of structs as the maximum alignment of its
> members. Since this struct contains 32-bit members, the alignment for the
> whole struct becomes 32 bits as well. Declaring it as packed tells gcc it
> might be unaligned (in addition to removing any holes within).
Unfortunately, declaring the struct or __be32* cast as packed have no
effect. I still get an ldm emitted.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 23:10 alignment faults in 3.6 Rob Herring
2012-10-05 0:58 ` Michael Hope
2012-10-05 1:26 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-05 1:56 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-05 2:25 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-05 3:04 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-10-05 5:37 ` Khem Raj
2012-10-05 7:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-05 8:20 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-05 8:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-05 8:33 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-05 8:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-05 8:37 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-05 8:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-05 13:49 ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-10-05 12:24 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-05 13:51 ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-10-05 16:01 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-05 22:37 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-05 22:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-06 1:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-10-06 16:04 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-06 16:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-10-06 16:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-06 10:58 ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-10-09 14:05 ` Scott Bambrough
2012-10-09 14:18 ` Mans Rullgard
2012-10-05 14:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-05 14:33 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-11 0:59 ` Jon Masters
2012-10-11 2:27 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-11 2:34 ` Jon Masters
2012-10-11 8:21 ` David Laight
2012-10-11 8:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-11 9:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-11 10:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 10:20 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-11 10:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 10:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-11 10:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 10:56 ` Maxime Bizon
2012-10-11 11:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 11:47 ` Maxime Bizon
2012-10-11 11:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 12:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 12:51 ` Maxime Bizon
2012-10-11 12:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-11 12:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-11 13:32 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-11 13:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-11 13:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 15:23 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-11 15:39 ` David Laight
2012-10-11 16:18 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-12 8:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-12 9:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-12 10:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-12 12:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-12 11:00 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-12 11:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-12 11:18 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-12 11:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-12 12:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-12 14:22 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-10-12 14:36 ` David Laight
2012-10-12 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-12 15:00 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-10-12 15:04 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-12 15:47 ` David Laight
2012-10-12 16:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-12 12:16 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-12 11:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-11 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-11 16:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-11 10:16 ` David Laight
2012-10-11 10:46 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-10-05 16:08 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-05 7:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-05 10:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-23 16:30 ` Jon Masters
2012-10-23 16:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-23 17:15 ` Jon Masters
2012-10-23 19:14 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506E4E23.4020803@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).