From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:23:05 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: davinci: register pruss_uio device on DA850 EVM In-Reply-To: <1349456686-22736-8-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> References: <1349456686-22736-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <1349456686-22736-8-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> Message-ID: <5072B091.1040007@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/5/2012 10:34 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > Configures the required pdata and registers the pruss_uio > platform device on the DA850 EVM. > > Tested on AM180x-EVM using the PRU_memAccessPRUDataRam and > PRU_memAccessL3andDDR examples from the PRU userspace tools > available from http://www.ti.com/tool/sprc940 > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c > index 7359375..6f9478b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -1253,6 +1255,10 @@ static __init int da850_wl12xx_init(void) > > #endif /* CONFIG_DA850_WL12XX */ > > +struct uio_pruss_pdata da8xx_pruss_uio_pdata = { > + .pintc_base = 0x4000, > +}; > + > #define DA850EVM_SATA_REFCLKPN_RATE (100 * 1000 * 1000) > > static __init void da850_evm_init(void) > @@ -1339,6 +1345,12 @@ static __init void da850_evm_init(void) > pr_warning("da850_evm_init: lcdcntl mux setup failed: %d\n", > ret); > > + da8xx_pruss_uio_pdata.sram_pool = sram_get_gen_pool(); > + ret = da8xx_register_pruss_uio(&da8xx_pruss_uio_pdata); > + if (ret) > + pr_warning("pruss_uio initialization failed: %d\n", > + ret); I failed to mention this last time around, but is there any reason platform data will change from board to board? Looks like the pintc_base is SoC specific and that all platforms would use SRAM when using the pruss driver. Looks like you can make da8xx_register_pruss_uio() take no parameters at all. Thanks, Sekhar