From: x0148406@ti.com (Afzal Mohammed)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] OMAP-GPMC generic timing migration
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:29:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50741FC0.4010502@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009030126.GB12552@atomide.com>
Hi Tony,
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 08:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Afzal Mohammed<afzal@ti.com> [121005 09:02]:
>> Proposed generic routine has been tested on OneNAND (async) on
>> OMAP3EVM rev C (as mainline does not have the OneNAND support for this,
>> local patch were used to test). For other cases of custom timing
>> calculation (tusb6010, smc91x non-muxed, OneNAND sync), generic timing
>> calculation routine was verified by simulating on OMAP3EVM.
> Have you tested to make sure this works if you change the
> L3 frequency?
With changed L3 frequency it was not tested.
I do not have a single board that is supported in mainline that
calculates on the run gpmc timing from device timing. What has
been tested here is OneNAND working in asynchronous mode
on omap3evm, but it's support is not available in mainline, so
private patch had to be used to test it. All other peripherals
were tested by simulation, i.e. by comparing output from existing
custom timing routine & generic routine for particular frequencies.
> That should probably be tested as a sanity check. Maybe you
> can force the L3 for some test boots for this, I don't think
> we scale it by default.
On omap3evm, don't know whether L3 frequency can be
changed & still have a working Kernel. I am not sure whether
it is worth attempting as OneNAND on omap3evm is not
supported in mainline.
Regards
Afzal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 16:00 [PATCH 0/4] OMAP-GPMC generic timing migration Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-05 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: generic timing calculation Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-05 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2+: onenand: " Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-05 16:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: OMAP2+: smc91x: " Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-05 16:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: OMAP2+: tusb6010: " Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-09 3:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] OMAP-GPMC generic timing migration Tony Lindgren
2012-10-09 12:59 ` Afzal Mohammed [this message]
2012-10-11 11:45 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-11 12:47 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-10-11 14:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-15 12:41 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-10-15 16:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-16 6:56 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-17 5:42 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-17 15:13 ` Daniel Mack
2012-10-17 15:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-18 5:26 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-19 15:34 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-10-22 19:51 ` Daniel Mack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50741FC0.4010502@ti.com \
--to=x0148406@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).