From: dmurphy@ti.com (Dan Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Boottime: A tool for automatic measurement of kernel/bootloader boot time
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:52:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507C3125.70702@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121012164221.GN12567@gmail.com>
On 10/12/2012 11:42 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Dan Murphy wrote:
>
>> On 10/12/2012 09:01 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday 12 October 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>>>> root at ME:/ cat /sys/kernel/debug/boottime/bootgraph
>>>>>> [ 0.185254] calling splash+0x0/0x0
>>>>>> [ 2.984335] initcall splash+0x0/0x0 returned 0 after 2799 msecs.
>>>>>> [ 2.984335] calling autoboot_delay+0x0/0x0
>>>>>> [ 4.089513] initcall autoboot_delay+0x0/0x0 returned 0 after 1105 msecs.
>>>>>> [ 4.089513] calling load_kernel+0x0/0x0
>>>>>> [ 4.239174] initcall load_kernel+0x0/0x0 returned 0 after 149 msecs.
>>>>>> [ 4.239174] calling boot_kernel+0x0/0x0
>>>>>> [ 4.276260] initcall boot_kernel+0x0/0x0 returned 0 after 37 msecs.
>>>>>> [ 4.276260] calling uncompress_ll_init+0x0/0x0
>>>>>> [ 4.276260] initcall uncompress_ll_init+0x0/0x0 returned 0 after 0 msecs.
>>>>>> [ 4.276260] Freeing init memory: 0K
>>>>> Umm, what happened to sysfs not becoming procfs v2? I thought we had
>>>>> a fairly strict requirement for "one value per file and not nicely
>>>>> formatted" for sysfs?
>>>>>
>>>> I was thinking the same thing at first, but then I noticed it's actually
>>>> debugfs, which has no such rules.
>>> Right. :)
>>>
>> OK I don't see when boottime_activate is called.
>>
>> Where would this call actually be made from?
>>
>> I see the call to deactivate but no call to activate.
> Here perhaps (Jonas, alerted me to the missing patch):
>
> commit 4c49a18bcfd2d041cbad7f41c6e6b39d90008382 (HEAD, refs/heads/dt-snowball-pre-rc1)
> Author: Jonas Aaberg<jonas.aberg@stericsson.com>
> Date: Wed Sep 14 09:29:20 2011 +0200
>
> drivers: clocksource: dbx500-prcmu: Add boottime support
>
> Change-Id: I9b5e3d050131c08c08786ae84cb76619c0525049
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Aaberg<jonas.aberg@stericsson.com>
> Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.lud.stericsson.com/gerrit/32055
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c
> index c26c369..0069cd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> */
> #include<linux/clockchips.h>
> #include<linux/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.h>
> +#include<linux/boottime.h>
>
> #include<asm/sched_clock.h>
>
> @@ -68,6 +69,23 @@ static u32 notrace dbx500_prcmu_sched_clock_read(void)
>
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOOTTIME
> +static unsigned long __init boottime_get_time(void)
> +{
> + return div_s64(clocksource_cyc2ns(clocksource_dbx500_prcmu.read(
> + &clocksource_dbx500_prcmu),
> + clocksource_dbx500_prcmu.mult,
> + clocksource_dbx500_prcmu.shift),
> + 1000);
> +}
> +
> +static struct boottime_timer __initdata boottime_timer = {
> + .init = NULL,
> + .get_time = boottime_get_time,
> + .finalize = NULL,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> void __init clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_init(void __iomem *base)
> {
> clksrc_dbx500_timer_base = base;
> @@ -90,4 +108,6 @@ void __init clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_init(void __iomem *base)
> 32, RATE_32K);
> #endif
> clocksource_register_hz(&clocksource_dbx500_prcmu, RATE_32K);
> +
> + boottime_activate(&boottime_timer);
> }
>
OK So has this been validated and tested on any other IC then a ST part?
This boottime_activate patch seems to be only for the dbx500. If this
is supposed to be a generic solution I would expect
a generic patch for ARM to enable boot time activation.
Have you profiled how much time the boot time logging has added to the
over all boot?
Also the boottime commit message should explain a little more what it is
measuring.
i.e. This patch enables logging the boot time from point x to point y
for the kernel only. This does not include init.
What about adding the boot time from the init sequence to init complete?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-15 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-11 14:42 [PATCH] Boottime: A tool for automatic measurement of kernel/bootloader boot time Lee Jones
2012-10-11 15:24 ` Christian Gmeiner
2012-10-11 15:36 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-11 20:17 ` Nishanth Menon
2012-10-12 9:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-12 9:51 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-12 13:35 ` Dan Murphy
2012-10-12 13:45 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-12 13:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-12 13:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-12 14:01 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-12 16:36 ` Dan Murphy
2012-10-12 16:42 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-15 15:52 ` Dan Murphy [this message]
2012-10-16 7:34 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-23 7:19 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507C3125.70702@ti.com \
--to=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).