From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:50:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] zynq subarch cleanups
In-Reply-To: <201210231441.29107.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20121022211040.GA31538@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com>
 <201210231441.29107.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <50870328.7080800@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10/23/2012 09:41 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>> Hey all-
>>
>> Things have been relatively quiet on the Zynq front lately.  This
>> patchset does a bit of cleanup of the Zynq subarchitecture.  It was the
>> necessary set of things I had to do to get a zynq target booting with
>> the upstream qemu model.  It removes some unused clock infrastructure,
>> adds DT support for the GIC, and moves around peripheral mappings.
> 
> Ok, thanks for these patches. As we have moved on for some of these issues,
> I'll comment on how to go even further. On a global scale, I wonder
> if there are any obstacles for enabling CONFIG_MULTIPLATFORM on Zynq
> as we have done for most of the other recently added platform.

IIRC, the only thing I saw preventing it was the custom clk usage.

Rob