From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ldewangan@nvidia.com (Laxman Dewangan)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:09:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH V4 3/4] ARM: tegra: dts: cardhu: enable SLINK4
In-Reply-To: <50915563.40904@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1351674176-20603-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
 <1351674176-20603-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
 <50915563.40904@wwwdotorg.org>
Message-ID: <50916264.3010107@nvidia.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wednesday 31 October 2012 10:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 03:02 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Enable SLINK4 and connected device in Tegra30 based
>> platform Cardhu.
>> Setting maximum spi frequency to 25MHz.
>>
>> Spi serial flash is connected on CS1 of SLINK4 on
>> cardhu platform.
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
>> +winbond Winbond Electronics corp.
> That should really be a separate patch that goes through the devicetree
> branch. But I guess it's fairly trivial, so it's not a big deal.
>

Yes, I thought that it should be in separate change. I did same on 
earlier for ISL29028 driver and found that this small change still not 
get merged. Therefore I clubbed this together as it can go without any 
issue.
I believe it is fine to merge vendor-prefix from any tree.


>
>> +		spi-flash at 1 {
>> +			compatible = "winbond,w25q32";
>> +			spi-max-frequency =<20000000>;
>> +			reg =<1>;
>> +		};
> Since I have an Atmel flash on my board, I see:
>
> [    1.282958] m25p80 spi32766.1: found at25df321a, expected w25q32
> [    1.289103] m25p80 spi32766.1: at25df321a (4096 Kbytes)
>
> Is there any way around that (the first log line above)?
>
> I suppose the answer is that the DT should reflect the exact flash
> device that's on the board, and perhaps the bootloader should be
> adjusting the DT to reflect the correct value. That's probably complex.
>
> Do you have any idea whether Atmel or Winbond flash is more common, so
> we can at least minimize the number of times this message appears?

I observe that most of cardhu have the winbond. All SQA machine has 
winbond. Also I believe on A04, it is winbond.
Better to go with winbond.